(excerpted and abdriged from The Changing Nature of Reference Questions in the Electronic Age, by George Williams, Valdosta State University)
Changing
reference questions
It was not so long ago that personal
computers were a relative rarity, even in libraries. Before the mid-1990s, the focus of academic
reference work primarily centered on readers and researchers needing help
interpreting or locating physical, printed resources. With the increased availability of PCs,
widespread internet connectivity, and electronic library materials, the number
and type of reference questions have been altered over time. By the 2000s,
researchers recognized that academic reference librarians were serving a
student cohort who had grown up alongside computing technology, and viewed
electronic communication and instant access as essential (Cardina & Wicks,
2004). De Groote, Hitchcock, and McGowan
(2007) explain that while the number of reference questions in one academic
library increased markedly between 1990 and 1997, the number had fallen sharply
by 2005. A qualitative analysis of their
findings further revealed that the most common reference questions were related
to journal and book holdings, or directional questions. Indeed, ARL libraries reported a 34% decline
in reference transactions from 1991 to 2004 (Sonntag & Palsson, 2007).
Martin (2009) found that reference
librarians were less frequently approached with simple reference questions
because computer users can find answers more quickly and comfortably by
consulting online sources. Patrons
typically have enough confidence in their searching skills that they do not
need to approach a reference librarian for assistance with ready
reference. Sonntag and Palsson (2007)
support the notion that reference questions are becoming more complex and time
consuming for reference librarians to answer, even as the number questions and
their intellectual quality decline.
Answering these questions often requires an instructional component,
highlighting the information literacy needs of student patrons.
Changing
practice
As reference queries
increasingly turn from short ready reference questions to more complex and
involved requests, academic libraries have adapted their reference services to
better serve patrons. One approach, detailed
by Sonntag & Palsson (2007), is to eliminate the reference desk. At California State
University, San Marcos, the researchers
found that by employing information assistants and removing the reference desk,
reference librarians could remain “on call” to give individualized help. This results in more personalized and
enjoyable help for student patrons, and also gives reference librarians time to
plan or deliver instructional lessons.
Technological
advances do not always mean finding a way to cope, however. Sometimes, they are an opportunity to expand
services. Many academic libraries now
utilize virtual reference services, which allow distance and online learners
(as well as students working remotely) access to reference librarians. Developing new spaces for reference is also
important to providing good service. For
instance, Drexel University established the Library Learning Terrace. Though it is not a traditional library, it
features a consultation area for students to meet with reference librarians. Bringing reference to students is a novel
approach when their work is increasingly done on portable mediums. (Kilzer,
2011) Having a virtual medium is a
definite benefit for many, but the results of Bishop and Bartlett (2013) showed
that students still engage in mostly face-to-face reference interactions. Their
study found that at the University of Kentucky, the vast majority of locational
and subject-specific reference queries were still asked face-to-face.
At the academic library I work at, virtual reference services have become a must. I was actually skeptical of their use in comparison to traditional face-to-face reference work, as I thought that the students would feel like they were being separated from the librarians and getting a diminished service. But it seems like a lot of students prefer the the quick and direct response that a chat window provides, especially when the librarian can provide links directly to the resources the student needs.
ReplyDelete